Environmental eating

March 9, 2010 in Personal | Comments (1)

Tags: ,

I had this crazy idea to start up a new web­site today, spe­cific­ally a wiki.

Jasna’s veget­arian and I’m semi-​​vegetarian (“flex­it­arian”, Wiki­pe­dia informs me), only because I’m a picky eater and the veget­arian options out­side of what we pre­pare at home often aren’t great.

Envir­on­mental reas­ons are cer­tainly the primary reas­ons for both of us. Meat is inher­ently inef­fi­cient: for most anim­als humans eat, it takes some­where around 10 Cal­or­ies of plant mat­ter to make 1 Cal­orie of animal mat­ter and it would make a lot of sense envir­on­ment­ally — and prob­ably eco­nom­ic­ally as well — to cut out the middle man and just eat the 10 Cal­or­ies of plant mat­ter. That inef­fi­ciency leads to increase land usage, water usage, soil erosion, etc. There are other envir­on­mental prob­lems, such as sewage and meth­ane emissions.

Well today I was lament­ing to myself that there really is no resource for find­ing out exactly what the envir­on­mental costs of foods are! To be sure, draw­ing the line at meat is a little arbit­rary. Veget­arian food, espe­cially meat altern­at­ives like TVP, can go through a lot of pro­cessing and, for all I know in my ignor­ance, end up being just as bad as meat. On the other side, for all I know, also in my ignor­ance, there are some meats out there that really aren’t a big prob­lem at all.

So I have a vis­ion: what if there were a wiki that allowed con­sol­id­at­ing inform­a­tion and maybe even ori­ginal research into what the envir­on­mental costs of foods are?

I don’t know if it’s prac­tical at all. To gauge interest I did my best at ask­ing an unbiased sur­vey while keep­ing an eye on the “Envir­on­mental dam­age from hus­bandry” option. My biggest fear is I’d just be cre­at­ing a web­site for myself that no one else will ever read; I already have one of those.

The closest thing I’ve found to what I’m look­ing for is food­ori­gins but it’s not really aim­ing at the same thing.

I don’t know. I’ll mull it over for a while longer. At stake is $10 for a domain regis­tra­tion and how­ever long it takes to set up a wiki these days.


One Response to “Environmental eating”

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

  1. Comment by Tim.March 10, 2010 at 2:35 pm   Reply

    I’d really like to have some­thing like that. Per­son­ally another thing I’d be look­ing for inform­a­tion like food­ori­gins (although food­ori­gins doesn’t have many cit­ies in it), along with spe­cific inform­a­tion on food pro­duc­tion companies.

    Also, when I buy product X from com­pany Y, what does that organic label really mean? What exactly does “spices” entail anyway?

    And yeah, then after fig­ur­ing out which products to buy, or not to buy, it’s hard to know where to buy the best foods, and dur­ing what time of year (some mar­kets are only open in the sum­mer, etc).

    Basic­ally I’d love to see a site where you type in a spe­cific food item avail­able at the gro­cery store, and you can bring up its info: what envir­on­mental impact it has, a link to the food pro­du­cer and some info about the com­pany and what type of impact it has based on all of its products, and any known info about the com­pany and its par­ent com­pany or subsidiaries.

    Maybe even a list of the product ingredi­ents where each ingredi­ent has a page that con­tains some con­cise info or links to research on health info for that ingredi­ent. Is Xantham gum bad? Most of the time I don’t want to read a wiki­pe­dia page while I’m at the gro­cery store, I just want to know: yes, no, or we’re not sure, you decide.

    Any­way… to any part of the above, I say whole­heartedly, YES. The world needs some­thing like that. Food pro­du­cers need more account­ab­il­ity and in my opin­ion the only way to take the power back is to util­ize the internets.

Leave a Reply

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>