Ugress and piracy
For those who know a bit about me, you know one of my favourite musicians is Gisle Martens Meyer, his most famous musical project being Ugress. I follow the blog, I buy the music, I download the music that isn’t sold, I even briefly considered making a trip to Minnesota at one point to see his first (and so far only) live show in North America. If I’m a “fan” of anything/anyone in this world, it’s surely Ugress. Still it took me over 2 weeks to build up the need to part with my hard-earned £6 (it’s always a fun surprise to find out at the end of the month how much my credit card company has charged me for foreign currency) and buy his latest album. In fairness, I am very cheap.
(If you’re interested in his music, most of his albums offer free tracks and the rest are only 79 pence each)
First, a brief review. Reminiscience is much better than Unicorn (the previously most recent album) in my opinion. Unicorn had some good songs but the direction of the album was a little poppy for me, focusing a lot around the vocals of Christine Litle (who I must confess is pretty darned cute and a good singer to boot). This album’s more about the beats and the sound aesthetics, which is what got me interested in Ugress in the first place. I’ve only listened to half the album so far and I already I have a good 3 or 4 new favourite songs.
Reading his blog, you get the impression that GMM is more a sound engineer than a composer. That’s probably an exaggeration (and it’s easier in text to describe engineering processes than a particular composition on the go), but it’s pretty clear he takes sound pretty seriously. I’ve paid special attention to it lately and noticed he really does a remarkable job of getting the most of the dynamic range that the (16-bit sample depth/90dB, if I’m not mistaken) MP3s will give you. Cool interesting post: describing how he used a speech synthesizer to generate lyrics. Okay now I really am sounding like a fan.…
Anyway what I really wanted to talk about was GMM’s reaction to the album being pirated (or copyright infringed upon to use made-up possibly correct terminology). He doesn’t just do the production himself, but he does all of the publishing and distribution and whatnot himself. Traditional music labels, I understand, are as good as dead and worse than useless. He gives out some free tracks, the rest are cheap and distributed largely online, he’s okay with mash-ups and public performances and derivative works and using his music as a background to your student film. He distributes the music in high quality (320kbit/s) non-DRM MP3s and even in FLAC.
What’s interesting about this is that he’s one of the very few (the only one I’m really closely familiar with) that is doing everything Right and makes it his day job (and then some; I worry a little if he has a life besides). Not that it I should be surprised that it would get pirated. People will pirate anything. People pirate free software. It’s almost like people put more effort into pirating than it would take to get something legitimately just for the sake of pirating. Well I’m not being fair: clearly people are pirating because a £6 album costs £6 more than a £0 album.
The primary reason I support free software is to give freedom to the users to use and repurpose the software however they like. This is from a dogmatic standpoint (I treat software publishers controlling their software with great suspicion), from a quality standpoint (there’s an annoying bug in OS X’s Terminal.app for the past 6 months or so that I could likely fix in literally a minute, but Apple has prevented me from doing so) and from a humanitarian standpoint (it’s near impossible to advance humanity with improving on one another’s work without permission). I can see how this carries over from software into other realms of “information”. One thing I’m definitely not is an economist, but I’ve increasingly viewed the Free Software Foundation’s freedom 2 (that you should be able to share what you like with your neighbour) with some hesitation. It’s a fantastic idea in a great many of cases (cf., Linux), but I don’t see this as a strict matter of freedom, but as a matter of economics and it’s one that I think can be treated on a case-by-case basis.
With this in mind I see GMM’s way of doing things as the Right way of doing things, or more accurately, as a Right way of doing things and would like more people to send him money in exchange for his hard work. Then again, I am just a fan. Seriously, The Bosporus Incident is awesome.